Chapter 4: Chapter Outline
The following annotated chapter outline will help you review the major topics covered in this chapter.
Instructions: Review the outline to recall events and their relationships as presented in the chapter. Return to skim any sections that seem unfamiliar.
I. Opening Vignette | |||
A. The 2007 book Are We Rome? asked if the United States has become the new Roman Empire. |
|||
1. collapse of the Soviet Union |
|||
2. overextension of the United States | |||
3. sense of unique, global mission |
|||
4. commitment to military dominance |
|||
5. reminder of continuing relevance of a long-dead empire |
|||
B. Modern fascination with empires |
|||
1. earliest empires developed in era of First Civilizations |
|||
a. Akkadian Empire |
|||
b. Babylonian Empire |
|||
c. Assyrian Empire |
|||
2. empires have been central to world history for 4,000 years |
|||
C. What is an empire? |
|||
1. simple answer: empires are political systems with coercive power |
|||
2. more typical: larger, more aggressive states |
|||
a. conquer other states |
|||
b. use their resources |
|||
c. usually include multiple peoples and cultures under a single political system |
|||
3. no clear line between empires and small multiethnic states |
|||
D. Eurasian empires of the classical era include: |
|||
1. Persian Empire |
|||
2. Greek empire of Alexander the Great |
|||
3. Roman Empire |
|||
4. Chinese empire (Qin and Han dynasties) |
|||
5. India (Mauryan and Gupta empires) |
|||
E. Common problems of classical empires: |
|||
1. Would they try to impose their culture on varied subjects? |
|||
2. Would they rule conquered peoples directly or through local elites? |
|||
3. How should they extract wealth while maintaining order? |
|||
4. all eventually collapsed |
|||
F. Why have empires always been so fascinating? |
|||
1. size was imposing |
|||
2. blood and violence of conquest |
|||
3. satisfaction in witnessing the fall of the mighty when they collapse |
|||
4. contrast to nonimperial civilizations |
|||
5. empires were important |
|||
a. majority of humans before twentieth century lived in empires |
|||
b. stimulated exchange of ideas, cultures, and values |
|||
c. peace and security encouraged development, commerce, and cultural mixing |
|||
II. Empires and Civilizations in Collision: The Persians and the Greeks |
|||
A. The Eurasian classical era saw a flowering of second-wave civilizations. |
|||
1. civilizations did not usually encounter each other directly |
|||
2. Mediterranean world and Middle East were the important exceptions |
|||
a. Persians and Greeks were neighbors |
|||
b. very important cultural encounter |
|||
B. The Persian Empire |
|||
1. in 500 B.C.E., it was the largest and most impressive empire |
|||
a. Persians were Indo-Europeans, homeland on the Iranian plateau | |||
b. imperial system drew on Mesopotamian prototypes |
|||
c. much larger and more splendid |
|||
d. Cyrus (r. 557–530 B.C.E.) and Darius (r. 522–486 B.C.E.) expanded empire from Egypt to India |
|||
e. diverse empire with population of around 35 million people |
|||
2. elaborate cult of kingship |
|||
a. rule by will of the god Ahura Mazda |
|||
b. absolute monarchy |
|||
3. holding the empire together |
|||
a. violent punishments by king |
|||
b. effective administrative system |
|||
c. respect for non-Persian cultural traditions |
|||
d. standardized coinage, predictable taxes | |||
e. encouragement of communication and commerce | |||
4. immense wealth and power |
|||
C. The Greeks |
|||
1. Indo-Europeans |
|||
2. classical Greece emerged ca. 750 B.C.E., flourished for about 400 years |
|||
3. distinctiveness of Hellenistic civilization |
|||
a. population of Greece and the Aegean basin was 2 million to 3 million people |
|||
b. geography of mountains, valleys encouraged development of hundreds of city-states and small settlements |
|||
c. shared common language and common gods |
|||
4. between 750 and 500 B.C.E., colonization around Mediterranean basin and Black Sea |
|||
5. most distinctive feature: popular participation in political life of city-states |
|||
a. equality of all citizens before the law |
|||
b. extent of citizenship varied depending on time and city |
|||
c. tyrants (dictators) emerged in many areas, supported by the poorer classes against the rich |
|||
d. Sparta gave most political authority to Council of Elders |
|||
e. Athens: most distinctive expression of political participation |
|||
f. differences between Athenian and modern democracy |
|||
D. Collision: The Greco-Persian Wars |
|||
1. point of collision was Ionia (Greek settlements on Anatolian seacoast) |
|||
a. in 499 B.C.E., some Ionian Greeks revolted against Persia |
|||
b. were supported by Athens |
|||
2. Persia responded with expeditions against Greeks in 490 and 480 B.C.E. |
|||
a. Greeks astonishingly defeated Persians on land and sea | |||
b. Greeks believed they won Battle of Marathon (490 B.C.E.) because they were motivated by Greek freedoms |
|||
3. notion of East/West divide as dominant theme in European thought |
|||
a. Greece = Europe, freedom |
|||
b. Persia = Asia, despotism |
|||
4. victory radicalized Athenian democracy: poor rowers received full citizenship |
|||
a. fifty-year Golden Age of Greek culture after Persian Wars |
|||
b. beginnings of imperialism |
|||
c. Peloponnesian War (431–404 B.C.E.) |
|||
E. Collision: Alexander and the Hellenistic Era |
|||
1. Philip II of Macedon completed conquest of Greece by 338 B.C.E. |
|||
a. political unification of Greece by force |
|||
b. plan for great Greek expedition against Persia |
|||
2. Alexander’s expedition against Persia (333–323 B.C.E.) |
|||
a. created a massive Greek empire that reached from Egypt and Anatolia to Afghanistan and India |
|||
b. defeat of Persian Empire, destruction of Persepolis |
|||
c. Alexander anointed as pharaoh of Egypt, declared to be “son of the gods” |
|||
3. Alexander died in 323 B.C.E.; empire divided into three kingdoms, ruled by Macedonian generals |
|||
4. Alexander’s conquests were most important in terms of world history for creation of the Hellenistic era (323–30 B.C.E.) |
|||
a. dissemination of Greek culture through much of Asia and Egypt |
|||
b. role of Hellenistic cities in spread of Greek culture |
|||
c. Alexandria in Egypt had enormous harbor, library of 700,000 volumes, and the Museum |
|||
5. A simplified form of Greek was widely spoken from Mediterranean to India |
|||
a. Indian monarch Ashoka published some of his decrees in Greek |
|||
b. many Jews were attracted to Greek culture; Pharisees developed their own school system to counter the influence |
|||
6. Hellenistic cities were much more culturally diverse than original Greek city-states |
|||
a. were not independent, but part of conquest states |
|||
b. Macedonians and Greeks formed the elite |
|||
c. cultural interaction and blending were still possible |
|||
7. Roman rule replaced that of Greeks in western part of Hellenistic world |
|||
III. Comparing Empires: Roman and Chinese |
|||
A. The Roman and Chinese empires had little direct contact but interesting similarities. |
|||
1. both flourished ca. 200 B.C.E.–200 C.E. |
|||
2. were of similar size (about 1.5 million square miles) |
|||
3. both had 50 million to 60 million people |
|||
4. between them, they controlled nearly half the world’s population |
|||
5. interesting variations on imperial theme |
|||
B. Rome: From City-State to Empire |
|||
1. started as small, unimportant city-state in central Italy in eighth century B.C.E. |
|||
2. overthrew monarchy and established a republic ca. 509 B.C.E. |
|||
3. conflict between patricians (wealthy class) and plebeians (poorer classes) |
|||
4. pride in republican values: rule of law, citizens’ rights, lack of pretension, morality—“the way of the ancestors” |
|||
5. creation of the empire |
|||
a. began in 490s B.C.E. with wars to control Italian peninsula |
|||
b. 264–146 B.C.E.: Punic Wars with Carthage |
|||
c. conquest of Greece, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and present-day Spain, France, and Britain | |||
d. reached greatest geographical extent in early second century C.E. |
|||
e. gradual, unplanned pursuit of opportunities |
|||
f. skill and brutality of Roman army |
|||
g. usually generous treatment of conquered peoples |
|||
6. political crisis of first century B.C.E. |
|||
a. rise of military leaders (Marius, Sulla, Pompey, Julius Caesar) |
|||
b. decline of republican values |
|||
c. Caesar Augustus (r. 27 B.C.E.–14 C.E.) was first emperor |
|||
7. establishment of pax Romana (Roman peace) |
|||
a. security |
|||
b. relative prosperity |
|||
C. China: From Warring States to Empire |
|||
1. creation of empire regarded as a restoration |
|||
a. Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties had created a Chinese state |
|||
b. system fell apart by 500 B.C.E. |
|||
c. age of warring states: seven competing kingdoms |
|||
d. multiple states were regarded as unnatural |
|||
2. unification by Shihuangdi, ruler of Qin (r. 221–210 B.C.E.) |
|||
a. adopted Legalism as political philosophy: clear rules and harsh punishments to enforce state authority |
|||
b. Shihuangdi means “first emperor” |
|||
3. expansion of empire into northern Vietnam and Korea and into steppes to northwest |
|||
4. creation of empire was brutal |
|||
a. military force |
|||
b. execution of scholars, book burning |
|||
c. hundreds of thousands of laborers built Great Wall |
|||
d. Shihuangdi’s monumental tomb, with about 7,500 life-size ceramic statues |
|||
e. standardized weights, measures, currency, written Chinese, and even axle lengths for carts |
|||
5. Qin dynasty collapsed in 206 B.C.E.; followed by Han dynasty (206 B.C.E.–220 C.E.) |
|||
a. kept Qin centralization |
|||
b. less harsh |
|||
D. Consolidating the Roman and Chinese Empires |
|||
1. both empires defined themselves in universal terms |
|||
2. both invested heavily in public works |
|||
3. both claimed supernatural sanctions |
|||
a. deceased Roman emperors as gods |
|||
b. Chinese emperor as Son of Heaven |
|||
4. both absorbed a foreign religious tradition |
|||
a. development of Christianity in Roman Empire |
|||
b. introduction of Buddhism into China by traders |
|||
5. relationships with societies they governed |
|||
a. Romans were always a minority in empire |
|||
b. ethnic Chinese had much larger cultural heartland |
|||
6. role of language differed in the two empires |
|||
a. Latin (alphabetic language) gave rise to Spanish, Portuguese, French, Italian, Romanian |
|||
b. Chinese characters (which represented words or ideas) could not be transferred easily to other languages |
|||
7. Roman Empire’s peoples maintained separate cultural identities far more than in China |
|||
8. Bureaucracy was much more elaborate in China than in Roman Empire |
|||
a. Chinese emperor Wudi (r. 141–87 B.C.E.) established an academy to train officials based on works of Confucius |
|||
b. Roman administration relied on regional elites and army |
|||
E. The Collapse of Empires |
|||
1. Why do they fall? |
|||
a. Han dynasty ended in 220 C.E. |
|||
b. traditional date for fall of western Roman Empire is 476 C.E.; eastern half survived as Byzantine Empire |
|||
2. common factors |
|||
a. excessive size, overextension, too expensive for available resources |
|||
b. no great technological breakthrough to enlarge resources |
|||
c. tax evasion by large landowning families |
|||
d. tax burden fell heavily onto the poor |
|||
e. rivalry between elite factions created instability |
|||
f. epidemic disease |
|||
g. |
threat from nomadic or semi-agricultural peoples on frontier: China dealt with Xiongnu; Roman Empire, with Germanic-speaking peoples | ||
3. effects of imperial collapse |
|||
a. decline of urban life |
|||
b. population decline |
|||
c. reduction of international trade |
|||
d. vast insecurity |
|||
4. most important difference between collapse of Han and Roman empires: what happened next |
|||
a. China: about 350 years of disorder, then creation of a similar imperial state (Sui, Tang, and Song dynasties) |
|||
b. Europe: no large-scale imperial system has ever been successfully established in Western Europe since Romans |
|||
c. Why was China more successful in restoration? |
|||
IV. Intermittent Empire: The Case of India |
|||
A. The idea of empire was much less prominent in India than in Persia, the Mediterranean, or China. |
|||
1. fall of Indus Valley civilization by 1500 B.C.E. |
|||
2. creation of new civilization along Ganges River |
|||
3. establishment in northern India of classic civilization of South Asia by 600 B.C.E. |
|||
a. enormous political, ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity |
|||
b. Indian civilization as a whole shaped by political fragmentation and cultural diversity |
|||
c. identity provided by distinctive religious tradition (Hinduism) and social organization (caste system) |
|||
B. Mauryan Empire (326–184 B.C.E.) |
|||
1. stimulated by Persian and Greek penetration of northwest |
|||
2. ruled all but southern tip of India |
|||
3. population of around 50 million |
|||
4. large military and civilian bureaucracy |
|||
5. state-operated industries |
|||
6. Ashoka (r. 268–232 B.C.E.) is best-known emperor, thanks to edicts |
|||
7. Mauryan Empire broke apart after Ashoka’s death |
|||
C. Gupta Empire (320–550 C.E.) and other short-lived empires followed |
|||
D. Why couldn’t India maintain an empire? |
|||
1. states failed to command loyalty |
|||
2. great cultural diversity |
|||
3. frequent invasions from Central Asia |
|||
4. caste system encouraged local loyalties |
|||
E. Indian trade flourished despite the lack of unity. |
|||
1. merchants and artisans patronized public buildings and festivals |
|||
2. Hinduism and Buddhism spread through much of Asia |
|||
3. Indian mathematics and astronomy flourished |
|||
V. Reflections: Classical Empires and the Twentieth Century |
|||
A. Classical empires continue to be used as models and inspirations. |
|||
1. Mao Zedong compared himself to Shihuangdi |
|||
2. Modern Indians pride themselves on Ashoka’s nonviolence and tolerance |
|||
3. Great Britain celebrated its empire as a modern Roman Empire |
|||
4. Mussolini regarded Italian expansion as the creation of a new Roman Empire |
|||
5. recent question: are Americans the new Romans? |
|||
B. There is a danger of misusing historical analogies, but history is vital to understanding the complexities of contemporary life. |